中国好歌曲

Can US afford cost of clean-energy protectionism in race for AI capabilities?_我的网站

A |     

    Illustration: Liu Xiangya/GT
Recent media reports have questioned whether a natural gas plant built to power an Amazon data center project in Texas could become the largest climate polluter in the US. The controversy, whatever the eventual outcome, offers a reality check for America's artificial intelligence (AI) drive. 
It exposes a growing contradiction: The US is racing to expand its AI capabilities, yet its protectionist trade policies are making it harder and more costly to access some of the clean-energy technologies needed to sustain that expansion. This raises a broader question: Can an energy-intensive AI race afford the costs of renewable energy protectionism?
The US is entering a new era of rising electricity demand. Data centers, the backbone of the AI economy, are emerging as one of the fastest-growing sources of power consumption. Much of that demand is still being met by fossil fuels: The International Energy Agency reports that natural gas supplies more than 40 percent of the electricity used by data centers in the US, making it their largest source of power. 
So, it's not surprising that the expansion of data centers has raised concerns over their environmental impact and the pressure they could place on local power systems and electricity bills. A Gallup survey conducted in March found that seven in 10 Americans opposed the construction of AI data centers in their local area, including 48 percent who strongly opposed such projects.
The findings point to a broader challenge for the US: The race to develop AI is increasingly becoming a race to meet growing energy needs. Addressing this challenge will require more than advances in computing technology; it will also depend on an energy system capable of delivering large amounts of reliable, affordable and cleaner power. That, in turn, will require faster development and broader deployment of clean-energy technologies, from solar power to energy storage.
Yet in the clean-energy sector, the US has increasingly relied on protectionist trade measures that limit access to cost-competitive products from global markets. The country has placed greater emphasis on expanding domestic manufacturing capacity, but rebuilding entire clean-energy supply chains at home is a costly and time-consuming process. Even if expanded domestic production is achieved, it is likely to come at a higher cost, making the deployment of renewable technologies more expensive and potentially slower.
The solar industry offers a clear illustration of this policy direction. The US has continued to expand trade barriers in the sector. Reuters reported that the US government announced on Thursday a series of price floors and a 15 percent tariff on products made from polysilicon, a raw material used in solar panels.
The challenge lies in the limited scale of the US polysilicon industry. Reuters reported that the country has two polysilicon factories. Against this backdrop, relying on domestic polysilicon production while restricting access to imports runs counter to the goal of expanding solar power in the US. The country risks creating barriers that ultimately constrain its own access to the global supply chains needed for growth.
The pressing issue for the US is the speed at which new power demand is emerging. The expansion of data centers is creating electricity needs that cannot wait for domestic clean-energy capacity to develop gradually. Global supply chains can provide the scale and speed required in the near term. By narrowing access to these sources, the US risks turning clean-energy policy into a drag on the infrastructure needed for its AI race.
The US has placed AI high on its economic and technological agenda. The outcome of this race will matter greatly, as financial markets are also watching whether America can turn its AI efforts into commercial success.
This leaves the US with a difficult choice: Can it afford the cost of clean-energy protectionism while racing to build AI infrastructure? The answer may be no. Trade barriers that limit access to competitive renewable technologies could ultimately become a constraint on the AI expansion that Washington is seeking to accelerate.
The author is a reporter with the Global Times. [email protected]

。    本报讯 孙强 记者刘波报道 今年以来，市税务局深入开展“便民办税春风行动”，根据企业不同行业、类型、规模，依托大数据精准画像，有针对性组建专项服务团队，开展因企施策、精准服务、未诉先办活动，涉税涉费诉求解决质效显著提升。

B |          　　开业服务及时雨，助力新办企业走好“第一步”。

C | 组建“新办纳税人服务团队”，通过大数据精准识别，筛选符合条件的企业，第一时间上门进行“开业第一课”辅导，帮助企业走好“第一步”。服务团队首先了解企业涉税费需求，然后从税收法律法规、业务办理流程和税费优惠政策等方面，进行“一对一”讲解、“手把手”辅导，帮助新办纳税人快速解决税费知识盲点、疏通系统操作堵点、明白办税缴费要点。服务团队不仅讲授税费“基础公共课程”，还开展个性化的“专项辅导课程”，同时还对企业涉税费风险进行温馨提醒。截至目前，此项服务已惠及全市新办纳税人6859户。

D |          　　定制服务出实招，助力大企业行稳致远。依托“侃侃青年创新工作室”设立大企业“量身定制”服务座谈室，建立联席服务座谈机制，实现政策及时传递、诉求及时收集、事项及时协调、疑难及时解决。通过与企业负责人、财务人员面对面交流，收集梳理企业税费政策需求热点，为企业量身定制“一企一策”税费政策大礼包。

E | 今年以来，已为21家大企业开展了量身定制服务，制定专属方案和风险应对提醒，解决纳税人实际业务问题12项，举办点对点分类分级培训6次，以高质量税企协同助力大企业完善税务内控，防范涉税风险，税务服务大企业质效持续提升。         　　特色服务广覆盖，助力中小企业绽放活力。根据辖区企业特点，组建中小企业服务团队，创新推出服务举措，做到政策推送专人负责、问题咨询精准解答、诉求回应及时高效。连山区税务局组织“税惠助农小队”，走进田间地头，因地制宜送政策、访需求、兴产业，全面助力种植业发展。绥中县税务局将办税“前线”与政策“后方”互融互通，组建“一线”税务服务志愿团队，开展“一对一”辅导、“面对面”交流，通过主动对接中小企业，开展“送政策、问需求、解难题”行动，为中小企业提供精准服务。经济开发区税务局成立“经税青宣”志愿服务队，深入园区企业，制作实用易懂的税费政策操作指引，向法人代表、财务人员、办税人员分类别进行辅导，做到分事项办事提醒，分类别精准辅导。截至目前，全市税务系统面向中小企业已开展定向定制服务65次，解决企业问题96个，持续助力中小企业轻装上阵、绽放活力。

Current article:http://7axgas.zhenzongtingrangunhongqiusao.shop/bup0ens/fow5pk.xlsx

Published on:00:08:27